<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782598</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order enhancing the customs value of imported water purifier spare parts. The Tribunal held that the declared transaction value, assessed by Customs (not self-assessed), must be accepted under Rule 3 of the Customs Valuation Rules unless specific statutory grounds for rejection are established. No such grounds or contraventions were alleged or proved. The authority had directly resorted to NIDB data to enhance value without first lawfully discarding the transaction value or establishing comparable &quot;identical&quot; or &quot;similar&quot; imports. Relying solely on NIDB data was held impermissible, rendering the value enhancement and consequent demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782598</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order enhancing the customs value of imported water purifier spare parts. The Tribunal held that the declared transaction value, assessed by Customs (not self-assessed), must be accepted under Rule 3 of the Customs Valuation Rules unless specific statutory grounds for rejection are established. No such grounds or contraventions were alleged or proved. The authority had directly resorted to NIDB data to enhance value without first lawfully discarding the transaction value or establishing comparable &quot;identical&quot; or &quot;similar&quot; imports. Relying solely on NIDB data was held impermissible, rendering the value enhancement and consequent demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>