https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782602 HC dismissed the writ petitions as not maintainable in view of an efficacious statutory appellate remedy. It held that the alleged non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and denial of cross-examination did not justify bypassing the alternate remedy, especially since the 335-page adjudication order demonstrated consideration of the petitioners' arguments and documents. HC declined to further scrutinize the merits to avoid prejudicing the petitioners' right of appeal. Relying on its earlier precedent on exhaustion of alternate remedies, HC criticized the growing practice of filing frivolous writ petitions to obtain interim reliefs and dismissed the petitions with costs of Rs. 50,000 each. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782602 HC dismissed the writ petitions as not maintainable in view of an efficacious statutory appellate remedy. It held that the alleged non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and denial of cross-examination did not justify bypassing the alternate remedy, especially since the 335-page adjudication order demonstrated consideration of the petitioners' arguments and documents. HC declined to further scrutinize the merits to avoid prejudicing the petitioners' right of appeal. Relying on its earlier precedent on exhaustion of alternate remedies, HC criticized the growing practice of filing frivolous writ petitions to obtain interim reliefs and dismissed the petitions with costs of Rs. 50,000 each. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782602