<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 144 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782604</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur quashed the revisionary order passed u/s 263 on the ground of non-application of mind by the Pr. CIT. The Pr. CIT directed initiation of penalty u/s 270A(2)(b) r.w.s. 270A(3)(i)(b) for under-reporting of income, but simultaneously concluded that the case attracted s. 270A(2)(c), revealing inconsistency and lack of due consideration. Relying on precedent of ITAT Delhi, the Tribunal held the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 to be arbitrary, bad in law and void ab initio, restoring the original assessment order in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 144 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782604</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur quashed the revisionary order passed u/s 263 on the ground of non-application of mind by the Pr. CIT. The Pr. CIT directed initiation of penalty u/s 270A(2)(b) r.w.s. 270A(3)(i)(b) for under-reporting of income, but simultaneously concluded that the case attracted s. 270A(2)(c), revealing inconsistency and lack of due consideration. Relying on precedent of ITAT Delhi, the Tribunal held the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 to be arbitrary, bad in law and void ab initio, restoring the original assessment order in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>