<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782627</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in toto. On the issue of carry forward of losses, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to allow the assessee company to carry forward losses, holding that section 79(2)(c) was not violated in the circumstances arising from the NCLT-approved resolution under the IBC. Additionally, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance of employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions, following the binding precedent of the SC in Checkmate Services, and rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction. The appeal was also independently liable to dismissal due to nil tax effect in view of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782627</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in toto. On the issue of carry forward of losses, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to allow the assessee company to carry forward losses, holding that section 79(2)(c) was not violated in the circumstances arising from the NCLT-approved resolution under the IBC. Additionally, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance of employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions, following the binding precedent of the SC in Checkmate Services, and rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction. The appeal was also independently liable to dismissal due to nil tax effect in view of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>