<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 194 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782654</link>
    <description>External development charges paid to the Department of Town &amp; Country Planning were held to fall within the scope of tax deduction at source under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, as the issue was covered by binding precedent. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the demand raised for non-deduction of tax, and the demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 194 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782654</link>
      <description>External development charges paid to the Department of Town &amp; Country Planning were held to fall within the scope of tax deduction at source under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, as the issue was covered by binding precedent. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the demand raised for non-deduction of tax, and the demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>