https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465010 An appeal filed after a delay of 727 days was found to be materially similar to earlier connected appeals dismissed on merits because the transactions were admitted. The appellants' stand before the original authority that their demat accounts were misused was inconsistent with their later claim before the Tribunal that they had no knowledge of the transactions, so the attempt to distinguish the earlier order was untenable. The appeal was therefore treated as without merit and dismissed. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:59:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465010 An appeal filed after a delay of 727 days was found to be materially similar to earlier connected appeals dismissed on merits because the transactions were admitted. The appellants' stand before the original authority that their demat accounts were misused was inconsistent with their later claim before the Tribunal that they had no knowledge of the transactions, so the attempt to distinguish the earlier order was untenable. The appeal was therefore treated as without merit and dismissed. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465010