<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1511 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465014</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; contribution to PF/ESI remitted after the due date prescribed under the relevant welfare laws is governed by section 36(1)(va), and the extended payment rule under section 43B does not cure the default. Timely deposit within the statutory due date is mandatory for allowance, so the deduction claim was rejected and the disallowance upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1511 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465014</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; contribution to PF/ESI remitted after the due date prescribed under the relevant welfare laws is governed by section 36(1)(va), and the extended payment rule under section 43B does not cure the default. Timely deposit within the statutory due date is mandatory for allowance, so the deduction claim was rejected and the disallowance upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>