<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48334</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal for a decision on its merits, emphasizing the importance of considering sufficient cause for delays in approaching the Tribunal and ensuring appeals are decided on their merits rather than technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48334</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal for a decision on its merits, emphasizing the importance of considering sufficient cause for delays in approaching the Tribunal and ensuring appeals are decided on their merits rather than technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>