<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mine closure provision allowed as deductible expense, but separate mine restoration claim disallowed under Section 43B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94651</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the assessee&#039;s provision for mine closure/restoration expenses, computed on a scientific basis and deposited in an escrow account pursuant to an approved Mine Closure Plan, is allowable as a deductible provision, consistent with the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for the preceding year. Finding no distinguishing facts, ITAT directed the AO to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for provision of Rs. 80.10 crores towards mine restoration expenses. However, the separate claim of Rs. 9.61 crores as expenditure u/s 43B was directed to be disallowed, in line with the earlier year&#039;s ruling. Consequently, both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:04:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mine closure provision allowed as deductible expense, but separate mine restoration claim disallowed under Section 43B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94651</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the assessee&#039;s provision for mine closure/restoration expenses, computed on a scientific basis and deposited in an escrow account pursuant to an approved Mine Closure Plan, is allowable as a deductible provision, consistent with the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for the preceding year. Finding no distinguishing facts, ITAT directed the AO to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for provision of Rs. 80.10 crores towards mine restoration expenses. However, the separate claim of Rs. 9.61 crores as expenditure u/s 43B was directed to be disallowed, in line with the earlier year&#039;s ruling. Consequently, both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:04:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>