<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48330</link>
    <description>Departmental Central Excise appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel for the appellant remained absent despite repeated calls of the matter. The court did not examine the merits of the dispute and disposed of the appeal solely on account of the appellant&#039;s absence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48330</link>
      <description>Departmental Central Excise appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel for the appellant remained absent despite repeated calls of the matter. The court did not examine the merits of the dispute and disposed of the appeal solely on account of the appellant&#039;s absence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>