https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782497 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the apprehension of the appellant regarding the corporate debtor's negotiations or settlements in breach of HC orders was misconceived. The Tribunal noted that the resolution professional had undertaken to conduct all litigation in accordance with its directions, including matters pending before the Bombay HC, as reflected in prior orders and correspondence. It clarified that only Prayer-G of the appellant's application had been considered in this appeal, found no ground to amend its earlier order, and disposed of the appeal without further relief. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782497 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the apprehension of the appellant regarding the corporate debtor's negotiations or settlements in breach of HC orders was misconceived. The Tribunal noted that the resolution professional had undertaken to conduct all litigation in accordance with its directions, including matters pending before the Bombay HC, as reflected in prior orders and correspondence. It clarified that only Prayer-G of the appellant's application had been considered in this appeal, found no ground to amend its earlier order, and disposed of the appeal without further relief. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782497