<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782504</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the customs petition as non-maintainable due to the availability of an effective alternate statutory remedy under Section 129 of the Customs Act. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s adjudication order, based on alleged violation of natural justice, was not entertained. HC held that a mere or technical breach of natural justice is insufficient without pleaded and established prejudice. Relying on precedent emphasizing exhaustion of alternate remedies, HC found no applicable exception and relegated the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782504</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the customs petition as non-maintainable due to the availability of an effective alternate statutory remedy under Section 129 of the Customs Act. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s adjudication order, based on alleged violation of natural justice, was not entertained. HC held that a mere or technical breach of natural justice is insufficient without pleaded and established prejudice. Relying on precedent emphasizing exhaustion of alternate remedies, HC found no applicable exception and relegated the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>