<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782523</link>
    <description>ITAT held that where purchases are completely non-genuine, estimation of profit does not apply and the entire amount of such bogus purchases must be added to income. The AO had established the non-existence of the suppliers and sham nature of the transactions, discharging the burden of proof. The assessee failed to produce supporting documents or appear despite opportunities. However, the assessee&#039;s statement denying transactions with one supplier was accepted, and that transaction was excluded. The order of CIT(A) was reversed, the AO&#039;s addition restored for four suppliers, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782523</link>
      <description>ITAT held that where purchases are completely non-genuine, estimation of profit does not apply and the entire amount of such bogus purchases must be added to income. The AO had established the non-existence of the suppliers and sham nature of the transactions, discharging the burden of proof. The assessee failed to produce supporting documents or appear despite opportunities. However, the assessee&#039;s statement denying transactions with one supplier was accepted, and that transaction was excluded. The order of CIT(A) was reversed, the AO&#039;s addition restored for four suppliers, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>