<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 366 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48321</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal by the manufacturer of non-alloy steel products, upholding the duty demand under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The court ruled that interest on duty should be charged from the date duty was required to be paid, not from the final capacity determination date. The original capacity determination remained unchanged. No substantial question of law was found, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 366 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48321</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal by the manufacturer of non-alloy steel products, upholding the duty demand under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The court ruled that interest on duty should be charged from the date duty was required to be paid, not from the final capacity determination date. The original capacity determination remained unchanged. No substantial question of law was found, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>