<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782526</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee had claimed deduction on donations made to a research institute which, after 31.03.2006, did not possess valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) and had obtained donations on the basis of forged approval documents. Relying on undisputed factual findings and consistent tribunal precedent, ITAT held that a donation supported by fraudulent or forged approval cannot qualify for weighted deduction, irrespective of the assessee&#039;s reliance on such documents. The CIT(A)&#039;s order granting relief to the assessee was quashed and the AO&#039;s disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782526</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee had claimed deduction on donations made to a research institute which, after 31.03.2006, did not possess valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) and had obtained donations on the basis of forged approval documents. Relying on undisputed factual findings and consistent tribunal precedent, ITAT held that a donation supported by fraudulent or forged approval cannot qualify for weighted deduction, irrespective of the assessee&#039;s reliance on such documents. The CIT(A)&#039;s order granting relief to the assessee was quashed and the AO&#039;s disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>