https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461 HC considered an application for bail in a case involving offences under Section 61(2) BNS and Sections 7, 7A Prevention of Corruption Act, where the applicant allegedly impersonated a CGST Commissioner and conspired with co-accused to demand illegal gratification. HC noted that investigation is complete, charge sheets are filed, and there is prima facie evidence including CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborated voice samples. The applicant was found to be the prime conspirator and had attempted to evade investigation and non-bailable warrants. Relying also on earlier bail rejection of co-accused affirmed by SC, HC rejected bail. en-us Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461 HC considered an application for bail in a case involving offences under Section 61(2) BNS and Sections 7, 7A Prevention of Corruption Act, where the applicant allegedly impersonated a CGST Commissioner and conspired with co-accused to demand illegal gratification. HC noted that investigation is complete, charge sheets are filed, and there is prima facie evidence including CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborated voice samples. The applicant was found to be the prime conspirator and had attempted to evade investigation and non-bailable warrants. Relying also on earlier bail rejection of co-accused affirmed by SC, HC rejected bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461