https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461 Bail was refused in a case alleging impersonation of a public servant, conspiracy to demand illegal gratification, and participation in a trap incident. The court relied on prima facie material in the charge-sheet and supplementary charge-sheet, including CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and voice comparison evidence, which indicated that the applicant posed as the Commissioner of CGST under the name of Mishraji and was present at the meeting place. The court also noted conduct suggesting evasion of investigation and non-bailable process. On that material, it found no basis to enlarge the applicant on bail. en-us Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461 Bail was refused in a case alleging impersonation of a public servant, conspiracy to demand illegal gratification, and participation in a trap incident. The court relied on prima facie material in the charge-sheet and supplementary charge-sheet, including CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and voice comparison evidence, which indicated that the applicant posed as the Commissioner of CGST under the name of Mishraji and was present at the meeting place. The court also noted conduct suggesting evasion of investigation and non-bailable process. On that material, it found no basis to enlarge the applicant on bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782461