<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 21 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782481</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval from the authority specified in section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act. Approval recorded by the Principal Commissioner did not satisfy that statutory requirement, so the sanction was defective. On that basis, the notice under section 148 was invalid and the reassessment proceedings under section 147 founded on it could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 21 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782481</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval from the authority specified in section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act. Approval recorded by the Principal Commissioner did not satisfy that statutory requirement, so the sanction was defective. On that basis, the notice under section 148 was invalid and the reassessment proceedings under section 147 founded on it could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>