https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48315 A challenge to forfeiture proceedings failed where a fresh show cause notice was treated as a continuation of an earlier notice that had been stayed during prior proceedings, so no inordinate delay vitiated the action. The High Court also held that the petitioner did not prove that the properties were acquired from a lawful source of income, as the claimed salary, agricultural income, fishing income, and voluntary disclosure lacked reliable documentary support. In writ jurisdiction, the Court declined to reappreciate evidence in the face of concurrent findings by the competent authority and appellate authority, and sustained the forfeiture order. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48315 A challenge to forfeiture proceedings failed where a fresh show cause notice was treated as a continuation of an earlier notice that had been stayed during prior proceedings, so no inordinate delay vitiated the action. The High Court also held that the petitioner did not prove that the properties were acquired from a lawful source of income, as the claimed salary, agricultural income, fishing income, and voluntary disclosure lacked reliable documentary support. In writ jurisdiction, the Court declined to reappreciate evidence in the face of concurrent findings by the competent authority and appellate authority, and sustained the forfeiture order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48315