https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63158 Finality of judicial verdicts is essential to preserve the rule of law and public confidence; verdicts should not be set aside simply because the judges who authored them have changed or demitted office. Recent reversals of orders, including on retrospective environmental clearances and a corporate insolvency liquidation direction, exemplify concerns about decisions being reopened by succeeding benches at the behest of aggrieved parties. Upholding verdict finality ensures judicial orders binding parties are conclusive, prevents endless litigation, and sustains trust in the judiciary. en-us Sun, 30 Nov 2025 17:16:03 +0530 Sun, 30 Nov 2025 17:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63158 Finality of judicial verdicts is essential to preserve the rule of law and public confidence; verdicts should not be set aside simply because the judges who authored them have changed or demitted office. Recent reversals of orders, including on retrospective environmental clearances and a corporate insolvency liquidation direction, exemplify concerns about decisions being reopened by succeeding benches at the behest of aggrieved parties. Upholding verdict finality ensures judicial orders binding parties are conclusive, prevents endless litigation, and sustains trust in the judiciary. News - Sun, 30 Nov 2025 17:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63158