<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 217 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48309</link>
    <description>Medicinal preparations containing Dextropropoxyphene-HCl at 70 mg per dosage unit fell within a Central Government notification excluding oral preparations containing not more than 135 mg of Dextropropoxyphene base from the definition of a narcotic drug or narcotic. Because the product was covered by that exclusion, it could not be treated as a medicinal preparation containing a narcotic drug or narcotic for the purpose of Clause 1(iii) of the Schedule to the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955. The State excise levy on the product was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned demand and classification were set aside with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 217 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48309</link>
      <description>Medicinal preparations containing Dextropropoxyphene-HCl at 70 mg per dosage unit fell within a Central Government notification excluding oral preparations containing not more than 135 mg of Dextropropoxyphene base from the definition of a narcotic drug or narcotic. Because the product was covered by that exclusion, it could not be treated as a medicinal preparation containing a narcotic drug or narcotic for the purpose of Clause 1(iii) of the Schedule to the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955. The State excise levy on the product was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned demand and classification were set aside with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>