https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48306 The Tribunal could not sustain its finding on the non-notified goods without examining the evidentiary record, because the record before the adjudicating authority did not show production of documents evidencing lawful import or lawful acquisition. The Department's challenge therefore succeeded to that extent and the Tribunal's order was interfered with for the non-notified goods. The notified goods had already been remanded for de novo consideration, so no substantive issue survived on that aspect. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:19:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48306 The Tribunal could not sustain its finding on the non-notified goods without examining the evidentiary record, because the record before the adjudicating authority did not show production of documents evidencing lawful import or lawful acquisition. The Department's challenge therefore succeeded to that extent and the Tribunal's order was interfered with for the non-notified goods. The notified goods had already been remanded for de novo consideration, so no substantive issue survived on that aspect. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48306