https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48305 The petition challenging the Tribunal's modification of its earlier order directing pre-deposit of duty amount was dismissed. The Tribunal's decision to dispense with the pre-deposit requirement was upheld as falling within its power to rectify mistakes under Section 35C(2) of the Act. The Court clarified that the Tribunal can modify its order but cannot review it, emphasizing the distinction between rectification of mistakes and review. Therefore, the impugned order was deemed justified, and no interference was warranted. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48305 The petition challenging the Tribunal's modification of its earlier order directing pre-deposit of duty amount was dismissed. The Tribunal's decision to dispense with the pre-deposit requirement was upheld as falling within its power to rectify mistakes under Section 35C(2) of the Act. The Court clarified that the Tribunal can modify its order but cannot review it, emphasizing the distinction between rectification of mistakes and review. Therefore, the impugned order was deemed justified, and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48305