<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Deduction under Section 80IA upheld as profit-shifting allegation fails in lift irrigation subcontract, TP additions deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94624</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) allowing deduction u/s 80IA to the assessee-company and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found that the civil works of the APSIDC Choutupalli lift irrigation project had been sub-contracted on a back-to-back basis to AE &quot;MEIL&quot;, with the assessee consciously retaining only 2% of the contract value, despite being eligible for deduction u/s 80IA. Comparative profit margins demonstrated that related party transactions yielded a lower margin than unrelated party transactions, negating the allegation of profit inflation. ITAT held there was no evidence of under-billing or involvement in civil construction by the assessee, rendering the TP/assessment additions unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Deduction under Section 80IA upheld as profit-shifting allegation fails in lift irrigation subcontract, TP additions deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94624</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) allowing deduction u/s 80IA to the assessee-company and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found that the civil works of the APSIDC Choutupalli lift irrigation project had been sub-contracted on a back-to-back basis to AE &quot;MEIL&quot;, with the assessee consciously retaining only 2% of the contract value, despite being eligible for deduction u/s 80IA. Comparative profit margins demonstrated that related party transactions yielded a lower margin than unrelated party transactions, negating the allegation of profit inflation. ITAT held there was no evidence of under-billing or involvement in civil construction by the assessee, rendering the TP/assessment additions unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>