<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service tax partly set aside; foreign forums non-taxable, inspection fees taxable; s.78 upheld, penalty waived under s.80</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94615</link>
    <description>CESTAT partly allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against service tax demands under reverse charge. It held that foreign exchange payments towards membership renewals and participation in international forums (IPG/IPFN) and participation fees paid to an overseas body for the &quot;Sword of Honour&quot; contest, performed and consumed abroad, were not taxable services; demands on these components, both pre- and post-01.07.2012 (for IPG/IPFN), were set aside. However, payments to a foreign inspection agency for pre-shipment inspection and certification were held to be taxable as &quot;technical inspection and certification service&quot; on a reverse charge basis; demand and interest were confirmed. Extended period of limitation and penalty under s.78 were upheld in principle, but monetary penalty was fully waived under s.80, Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service tax partly set aside; foreign forums non-taxable, inspection fees taxable; s.78 upheld, penalty waived under s.80</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94615</link>
      <description>CESTAT partly allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against service tax demands under reverse charge. It held that foreign exchange payments towards membership renewals and participation in international forums (IPG/IPFN) and participation fees paid to an overseas body for the &quot;Sword of Honour&quot; contest, performed and consumed abroad, were not taxable services; demands on these components, both pre- and post-01.07.2012 (for IPG/IPFN), were set aside. However, payments to a foreign inspection agency for pre-shipment inspection and certification were held to be taxable as &quot;technical inspection and certification service&quot; on a reverse charge basis; demand and interest were confirmed. Extended period of limitation and penalty under s.78 were upheld in principle, but monetary penalty was fully waived under s.80, Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>