<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1896 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782428</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) cannot be sustained for alleged non-compliance with a section 142(1) notice unless service of the notice is established. Where the assessee was a non-resident and the record did not show service, mere issuance of the notice was insufficient because the assessee had no effective knowledge of the proceedings or real opportunity to comply. On that basis, the penalty was held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1896 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782428</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) cannot be sustained for alleged non-compliance with a section 142(1) notice unless service of the notice is established. Where the assessee was a non-resident and the record did not show service, mere issuance of the notice was insufficient because the assessee had no effective knowledge of the proceedings or real opportunity to comply. On that basis, the penalty was held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>