<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1910 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782442</link>
    <description>HC quashed the reassessment proceedings, holding that the assessee-trust had duly complied with section 11(2) of the Income-tax Act. The trust had specified the particular purposes of accumulation in Form 10 by expressly referring to a resolution, and had also electronically filed a copy of that resolution, which formed part of the assessment record. HC held that the limited space in Form 10 and the statutory format justified referring to the resolution instead of reproducing all purposes. Once section 11(2) conditions are fulfilled, the AO has no discretion to deny the exemption. The reasons recorded for reopening, alleging non-compliance, were found erroneous and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1910 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782442</link>
      <description>HC quashed the reassessment proceedings, holding that the assessee-trust had duly complied with section 11(2) of the Income-tax Act. The trust had specified the particular purposes of accumulation in Form 10 by expressly referring to a resolution, and had also electronically filed a copy of that resolution, which formed part of the assessment record. HC held that the limited space in Form 10 and the statutory format justified referring to the resolution instead of reproducing all purposes. Once section 11(2) conditions are fulfilled, the AO has no discretion to deny the exemption. The reasons recorded for reopening, alleging non-compliance, were found erroneous and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>