<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1913 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782445</link>
    <description>Indian tax exposure for a fixed place permanent establishment turns on whether the foreign enterprise had a place at its disposal and carried on business through it with sufficient stability, productivity and dependence. The discussion notes that Article 5(4) and the concept of a dependent agent permanent establishment require concrete evidence of a collaborative exercise creating a fixed place PE, not mere assertions. It also records that reassessment notices under sections 147 and 148 were criticised for lacking material to show that a fixed place PE had come into existence. The text further refers to the Delhi High Court&#039;s explanation of the relevant PE tests and the phrases &quot;at the disposal of&quot; and &quot;through&quot;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1913 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782445</link>
      <description>Indian tax exposure for a fixed place permanent establishment turns on whether the foreign enterprise had a place at its disposal and carried on business through it with sufficient stability, productivity and dependence. The discussion notes that Article 5(4) and the concept of a dependent agent permanent establishment require concrete evidence of a collaborative exercise creating a fixed place PE, not mere assertions. It also records that reassessment notices under sections 147 and 148 were criticised for lacking material to show that a fixed place PE had come into existence. The text further refers to the Delhi High Court&#039;s explanation of the relevant PE tests and the phrases &quot;at the disposal of&quot; and &quot;through&quot;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>