<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782450</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a show cause notice was dismissed because the petitioner had an alternative and more effective remedy before the adjudicating authority, making the writ challenge premature. The court left the petitioner at liberty to participate in the adjudication proceedings and to raise all available legal contentions there.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782450</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a show cause notice was dismissed because the petitioner had an alternative and more effective remedy before the adjudicating authority, making the writ challenge premature. The court left the petitioner at liberty to participate in the adjudication proceedings and to raise all available legal contentions there.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>