<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HIGHLIGHTS FROM SUPREME COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63085</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court sought the Rajasthan government&#039;s response to a challenge to the Rajasthan anti-conversion law and asked the Law Commission to examine a Buddhist group&#039;s plea that certain personal Hindu laws violate religious freedom; it sought responses on alleged coercive menstrual proofing of sanitation workers and on unpaid stipends to foreign medical interns, dismissed anticipatory bail and an insolvency-related challenge, scheduled waqf registration hearings, rebuked executive inaction on university appointments, stressed access to justice for poor litigants, and held cheque-bounce complaints are subject to the complainant bank&#039;s territorial jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 20:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 20:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HIGHLIGHTS FROM SUPREME COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63085</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court sought the Rajasthan government&#039;s response to a challenge to the Rajasthan anti-conversion law and asked the Law Commission to examine a Buddhist group&#039;s plea that certain personal Hindu laws violate religious freedom; it sought responses on alleged coercive menstrual proofing of sanitation workers and on unpaid stipends to foreign medical interns, dismissed anticipatory bail and an insolvency-related challenge, scheduled waqf registration hearings, rebuked executive inaction on university appointments, stressed access to justice for poor litigants, and held cheque-bounce complaints are subject to the complainant bank&#039;s territorial jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 20:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=63085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>