<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 214 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48291</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing for the condonation of delays beyond the prescribed 180-day period. The conflicting decisions by different Division Benches were reconciled, and the appeals were restored for further consideration in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 214 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48291</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing for the condonation of delays beyond the prescribed 180-day period. The conflicting decisions by different Division Benches were reconciled, and the appeals were restored for further consideration in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>