<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 406 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48286</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appellant is entitled to claim duty credit on returned goods under sub-rule (1) of Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, allowing the appeal and canceling the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance of the claim. The Court clarified that sub-rules (1) and (2) operate differently, with sub-rule (1) providing an absolute entitlement for duty credit upon the return of goods for re-making, refining, or other reasons, without requiring re-manufacturing or selling to the original purchaser.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 406 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48286</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appellant is entitled to claim duty credit on returned goods under sub-rule (1) of Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, allowing the appeal and canceling the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance of the claim. The Court clarified that sub-rules (1) and (2) operate differently, with sub-rule (1) providing an absolute entitlement for duty credit upon the return of goods for re-making, refining, or other reasons, without requiring re-manufacturing or selling to the original purchaser.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>