https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48280 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge on the jurisdiction of customs authorities to forward samples for testing at the Central Food Laboratory. However, it acknowledged the lack of representativeness in the sampling method used by respondents and directed them to draw a representative sample of the wet dates for analysis. The court ordered that the sample be analyzed by the Central Food Laboratory or an authorized laboratory as per the Customs Manual. Subsequently, the respondents will decide on the petitioner's cargo clearance claim, leading to the disposal of the writ petition. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:01:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48280 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge on the jurisdiction of customs authorities to forward samples for testing at the Central Food Laboratory. However, it acknowledged the lack of representativeness in the sampling method used by respondents and directed them to draw a representative sample of the wet dates for analysis. The court ordered that the sample be analyzed by the Central Food Laboratory or an authorized laboratory as per the Customs Manual. Subsequently, the respondents will decide on the petitioner's cargo clearance claim, leading to the disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48280