<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48278</link>
    <description>Under the MODVAT scheme, gate passes issued before 1-4-1994 remained valid for credit even if endorsed after that date, because the notification required only pre-cutoff issuance and timely taking of credit. The later endorsement did not defeat eligibility in the absence of any express condition that endorsement also had to occur before the cutoff date. The credit claim was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48278</link>
      <description>Under the MODVAT scheme, gate passes issued before 1-4-1994 remained valid for credit even if endorsed after that date, because the notification required only pre-cutoff issuance and timely taking of credit. The later endorsement did not defeat eligibility in the absence of any express condition that endorsement also had to occur before the cutoff date. The credit claim was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>