https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48277 The High Court granted mandamus against Respondent No. 3 to comply with CESTAT direction, allowing license renewal application before expiry. Emphasizing discretion in renewal criteria interpretation, the Court found no adverse factors against petitioners, remitting the matter for reconsideration. Upholding justice, the Court directed license renewal without costs, enabling petitioners to continue business operations. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48277 The High Court granted mandamus against Respondent No. 3 to comply with CESTAT direction, allowing license renewal application before expiry. Emphasizing discretion in renewal criteria interpretation, the Court found no adverse factors against petitioners, remitting the matter for reconsideration. Upholding justice, the Court directed license renewal without costs, enabling petitioners to continue business operations. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48277