https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782395 NCLAT, Principal Bench, dismissed an application seeking recall of its earlier judgment concerning delay in filing an appeal and exclusion of time under s.14 of the Limitation Act. The Tribunal reiterated that grounds for recall are narrowly circumscribed and must fit within well-settled parameters. Reliance on SC and prior NCLAT precedents did not assist the applicant, as the alleged fraud related to the conduct of the CIRP, not to the order dated 21.11.2024 or the condonation of delay proceedings. Since the assertions of fraud did not pertain to the judgment sought to be recalled, no recognized ground for recall was made out, and the application was rejected. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782395 NCLAT, Principal Bench, dismissed an application seeking recall of its earlier judgment concerning delay in filing an appeal and exclusion of time under s.14 of the Limitation Act. The Tribunal reiterated that grounds for recall are narrowly circumscribed and must fit within well-settled parameters. Reliance on SC and prior NCLAT precedents did not assist the applicant, as the alleged fraud related to the conduct of the CIRP, not to the order dated 21.11.2024 or the condonation of delay proceedings. Since the assertions of fraud did not pertain to the judgment sought to be recalled, no recognized ground for recall was made out, and the application was rejected. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782395