<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue&#039;s bogus wage addition of Rs.15.80 crore deleted; s.145 not invoked, private cash notings held inconclusive</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94598</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld in toto the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs. 15.80 crore towards alleged bogus wage expenditure for A.Y. 2022-23 in the case of Assessee Co. ITAT held that the AO&#039;s reliance on cash scroll notings such as &quot;MD Personal&quot; was unsupported by any corroborative evidence, cash trail, or proof of personal use by the Managing Director, and that such private notings cannot, by themselves, constitute conclusive evidence of non-genuine expenditure. As the AO had not rejected the books under s.145, and the assessee&#039;s profit ratio was consistent with past years, the impugned disallowance was found arbitrary and unsustainable. All grounds raised by the Revenue were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue&#039;s bogus wage addition of Rs.15.80 crore deleted; s.145 not invoked, private cash notings held inconclusive</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94598</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld in toto the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs. 15.80 crore towards alleged bogus wage expenditure for A.Y. 2022-23 in the case of Assessee Co. ITAT held that the AO&#039;s reliance on cash scroll notings such as &quot;MD Personal&quot; was unsupported by any corroborative evidence, cash trail, or proof of personal use by the Managing Director, and that such private notings cannot, by themselves, constitute conclusive evidence of non-genuine expenditure. As the AO had not rejected the books under s.145, and the assessee&#039;s profit ratio was consistent with past years, the impugned disallowance was found arbitrary and unsustainable. All grounds raised by the Revenue were rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>