<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Transaction Value, Restores Classification and Section 114(iii) Penalty, Drops Confiscation and Section 114AA Charge</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94591</link>
    <description>CESTAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; setting aside of the Joint Commissioner&#039;s rejection and redetermination of the declared FOB value, holding that the proper officer had neither validly rejected the transaction value under rule 8 nor followed the mandatory sequential valuation under rules 4 to 6. However, it restored the Joint Commissioner&#039;s reclassification of the export goods under the correct serial numbers of the Drawback and ROSCTL Schedules, as CRCL&#039;s test confirmed the garments were of blended fabric and not 100% cotton. Confiscation per se and redemption fine were found unsustainable in the facts, particularly in view of the provisional release bond terms. Penalty under section 114AA wa.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Transaction Value, Restores Classification and Section 114(iii) Penalty, Drops Confiscation and Section 114AA Charge</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94591</link>
      <description>CESTAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; setting aside of the Joint Commissioner&#039;s rejection and redetermination of the declared FOB value, holding that the proper officer had neither validly rejected the transaction value under rule 8 nor followed the mandatory sequential valuation under rules 4 to 6. However, it restored the Joint Commissioner&#039;s reclassification of the export goods under the correct serial numbers of the Drawback and ROSCTL Schedules, as CRCL&#039;s test confirmed the garments were of blended fabric and not 100% cotton. Confiscation per se and redemption fine were found unsustainable in the facts, particularly in view of the provisional release bond terms. Penalty under section 114AA wa.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>