https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48271 The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the Appellant's inadequate explanation for the delay. Despite citing officer transfers and communication gaps as reasons, the Court found the delay unjustified, criticizing the Appellant for a lack of seriousness in addressing the issues raised in the order. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal timelines, the Court directed the Appellant to pay costs to the Delhi Legal Services Authority. en-us Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48271 The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the Appellant's inadequate explanation for the delay. Despite citing officer transfers and communication gaps as reasons, the Court found the delay unjustified, criticizing the Appellant for a lack of seriousness in addressing the issues raised in the order. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal timelines, the Court directed the Appellant to pay costs to the Delhi Legal Services Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48271