<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1821 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782353</link>
    <description>ITAT held that interest earned by the assessee, a government-owned transmission company, on unutilized specific-purpose government grants kept in fixed deposits is not taxable as business income but is inextricably linked to the grants and should be treated as increasing the grant amount from the State Government. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s view that such funds and interest are held on behalf of the Government and kept separate from the assessee&#039;s regular transactions. ITAT also upheld CIT(A)&#039;s treatment of expenditure incurred for restoration of transmission infrastructure damaged by HUDHUD cyclone as revenue in nature, allowable in the year of incurrence, with any future reimbursement from the State to be taxed when received. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1821 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782353</link>
      <description>ITAT held that interest earned by the assessee, a government-owned transmission company, on unutilized specific-purpose government grants kept in fixed deposits is not taxable as business income but is inextricably linked to the grants and should be treated as increasing the grant amount from the State Government. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s view that such funds and interest are held on behalf of the Government and kept separate from the assessee&#039;s regular transactions. ITAT also upheld CIT(A)&#039;s treatment of expenditure incurred for restoration of transmission infrastructure damaged by HUDHUD cyclone as revenue in nature, allowable in the year of incurrence, with any future reimbursement from the State to be taxed when received. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>