<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782355</link>
    <description>Long-term capital gains addition was not sustained because the Tribunal found the gains had been invested and the assessee qualified for deduction under Section 54EC. On that basis, it held that no tax liability arose on the disputed amount and resolved the issues in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782355</link>
      <description>Long-term capital gains addition was not sustained because the Tribunal found the gains had been invested and the assessee qualified for deduction under Section 54EC. On that basis, it held that no tax liability arose on the disputed amount and resolved the issues in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>