<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1824 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782356</link>
    <description>ITAT AH held that the assessee trust, already granted provisional registration u/s 12AB, is eligible to seek final registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) despite expiry of six months from commencement of activities prior to grant of provisional registration. The Tribunal held that the provision must be interpreted liberally so that a trust is not denied final registration merely because its activities began more than six months before provisional registration, particularly when exemption u/s 11 had been claimed from AY 2019-20. The order rejecting the application was set aside and the matter remanded to CIT(E) to reconsider registration, permitting a fresh application if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1824 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782356</link>
      <description>ITAT AH held that the assessee trust, already granted provisional registration u/s 12AB, is eligible to seek final registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) despite expiry of six months from commencement of activities prior to grant of provisional registration. The Tribunal held that the provision must be interpreted liberally so that a trust is not denied final registration merely because its activities began more than six months before provisional registration, particularly when exemption u/s 11 had been claimed from AY 2019-20. The order rejecting the application was set aside and the matter remanded to CIT(E) to reconsider registration, permitting a fresh application if required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>