https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48270 A writ petition challenging an excise demand and penalty based on alleged suppression of production and clearance was not entertained because the dispute was fact-intensive and a statutory appellate remedy was available under the Central Excise Act. The High Court declined to undertake appreciation of evidence in writ jurisdiction and held that the parties should pursue the appropriate alternative forum. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:25:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48270 A writ petition challenging an excise demand and penalty based on alleged suppression of production and clearance was not entertained because the dispute was fact-intensive and a statutory appellate remedy was available under the Central Excise Act. The High Court declined to undertake appreciation of evidence in writ jurisdiction and held that the parties should pursue the appropriate alternative forum. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48270