<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1829 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782361</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s appeal in substantial part for AY 2012-13. Disallowance of CSR expenses was deleted as AO failed to specify any expenditure beyond CSR scope and, for the relevant year, CSR outlays were allowable, with restriction applying only from AY 2015-16. Addition for donation and charity was also deleted, following precedent for a sister concern and noting the embargo under s.37 applied prospectively from AY 2015-16. Disallowance under s.14A was set aside since investments were made from sufficient interest-free funds. On additional depreciation under s.32(1)(iia), the issue was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication due to lack of factual enquiry and details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1829 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782361</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s appeal in substantial part for AY 2012-13. Disallowance of CSR expenses was deleted as AO failed to specify any expenditure beyond CSR scope and, for the relevant year, CSR outlays were allowable, with restriction applying only from AY 2015-16. Addition for donation and charity was also deleted, following precedent for a sister concern and noting the embargo under s.37 applied prospectively from AY 2015-16. Disallowance under s.14A was set aside since investments were made from sufficient interest-free funds. On additional depreciation under s.32(1)(iia), the issue was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication due to lack of factual enquiry and details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>