<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1841 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782373</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition for alleged bogus wage expenditure for AY 2022-23. The AO had treated cash entries marked &quot;MD Personal&quot; as personal withdrawals of the managing director and disallowed about Rs. 15.80 crore on an apportionment basis, without rejecting the books under s.145 or establishing a cash trail, fictitious recipients, or parallel accounts. ITAT held that private notings and self-made vouchers, without corroborative evidence, cannot justify treating genuine labour-intensive business wages as bogus, especially where the declared net profit rate (12.04%) is consistent with earlier years and the addition would yield an abnormally high margin (22.88%). Finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ITAT sustained it in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:24:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1841 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782373</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition for alleged bogus wage expenditure for AY 2022-23. The AO had treated cash entries marked &quot;MD Personal&quot; as personal withdrawals of the managing director and disallowed about Rs. 15.80 crore on an apportionment basis, without rejecting the books under s.145 or establishing a cash trail, fictitious recipients, or parallel accounts. ITAT held that private notings and self-made vouchers, without corroborative evidence, cannot justify treating genuine labour-intensive business wages as bogus, especially where the declared net profit rate (12.04%) is consistent with earlier years and the addition would yield an abnormally high margin (22.88%). Finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ITAT sustained it in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>