<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48267</link>
    <description>The court found the petitioner&#039;s contention genuine regarding the non-receipt of the Form 2B certificate under the Kar vivad Samadhan Scheme. Despite the Postal Department&#039;s failure to provide evidence of delivery attempts, the court directed the respondents to furnish the certificate within two weeks to ensure compliance with the Finance Act. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48267</link>
      <description>The court found the petitioner&#039;s contention genuine regarding the non-receipt of the Form 2B certificate under the Kar vivad Samadhan Scheme. Despite the Postal Department&#039;s failure to provide evidence of delivery attempts, the court directed the respondents to furnish the certificate within two weeks to ensure compliance with the Finance Act. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>