<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1846 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464980</link>
    <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s refusal to condone delay in filing the appeal, holding that no sufficient cause was shown for the belated filing. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, SC declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed and the impugned judgment of the HC stood confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1846 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464980</link>
      <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s refusal to condone delay in filing the appeal, holding that no sufficient cause was shown for the belated filing. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, SC declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed and the impugned judgment of the HC stood confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>