https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464988 Binding precedent on limitation for orders under section 201(1) in the case of a non-resident was accepted, and the Revenue did not dispute that position; the challenge on limitation was therefore answered in favour of the assessee. The contention that the Tribunal's order was perverse for not examining the merits of the section 201(1) order also failed, because the questions of law were treated as covered by precedent. The appeal was dismissed and the Tribunal's decision was left undisturbed, with the substantial questions of law decided against the Revenue. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464988 Binding precedent on limitation for orders under section 201(1) in the case of a non-resident was accepted, and the Revenue did not dispute that position; the challenge on limitation was therefore answered in favour of the assessee. The contention that the Tribunal's order was perverse for not examining the merits of the section 201(1) order also failed, because the questions of law were treated as covered by precedent. The appeal was dismissed and the Tribunal's decision was left undisturbed, with the substantial questions of law decided against the Revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464988