<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1722 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464989</link>
    <description>HC upheld deletion of additions made u/s 68 and 37 relating to alleged unexplained unsecured loans and disallowance of interest expenses. It held that the assessee had repaid the entire loan, either in the relevant year or subsequent years, through banking channels and had furnished complete details of receipts and repayments. The assessee produced supporting documents establishing identity, creditworthiness of lenders, and genuineness of transactions, including bank statements, income-tax returns, and confirmations, thereby discharging its onus. Consequently, the HC affirmed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order deleting the additions, and as a corollary, deleted the interest disallowance. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1722 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464989</link>
      <description>HC upheld deletion of additions made u/s 68 and 37 relating to alleged unexplained unsecured loans and disallowance of interest expenses. It held that the assessee had repaid the entire loan, either in the relevant year or subsequent years, through banking channels and had furnished complete details of receipts and repayments. The assessee produced supporting documents establishing identity, creditworthiness of lenders, and genuineness of transactions, including bank statements, income-tax returns, and confirmations, thereby discharging its onus. Consequently, the HC affirmed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order deleting the additions, and as a corollary, deleted the interest disallowance. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>