<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48258</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of &#039;CEGAT,&#039; affirming that the items claimed by the respondents fell within the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The judgment favored the respondents, concluding that the benefits claimed were rightly categorized as capital goods. As a result, the Central Excise Reference was disallowed, resolving the issue in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48258</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of &#039;CEGAT,&#039; affirming that the items claimed by the respondents fell within the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The judgment favored the respondents, concluding that the benefits claimed were rightly categorized as capital goods. As a result, the Central Excise Reference was disallowed, resolving the issue in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>