<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464974</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16 initiated under s.148 on or after 1.4.2021 are barred by limitation under the new reassessment regime and inapplicable extension provisions of TOLA. The notice issued on 30.07.2022 was therefore invalid, rendering the consequential reassessment order void ab initio. The Tribunal quashed the impugned reassessment order in entirety, holding it bad in law. All grounds raised by the assessee challenging the validity of the reopening and reassessment were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:03:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464974</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16 initiated under s.148 on or after 1.4.2021 are barred by limitation under the new reassessment regime and inapplicable extension provisions of TOLA. The notice issued on 30.07.2022 was therefore invalid, rendering the consequential reassessment order void ab initio. The Tribunal quashed the impugned reassessment order in entirety, holding it bad in law. All grounds raised by the assessee challenging the validity of the reopening and reassessment were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>